Видео

I have figured out a way to compute and explain for gravity, light, thermal energy, time, causality, life, mass, number, identity, consciousness, paradox, entropy, space, nothingness, infinity, and existence. I'm not a mathematician but I have used the equations from people who are to create simple axioms are things taken for granted like the effects of relativity in quantum physics and such a through processes of logical symmetries I have figured out how to show how everything causes everything else in a chain of causality growth and multiplication that is self causal in an infinite or an infinite series a strange feedback loops there are one gigantic feedback loop in of itself. It explains where light comes from what the purpose of consciousness in life and entropy are and why the speed of light is what it is and why the universe is the size it is and why the Planck lengths are what they are even though I know most of this has already been described but it hasn't all been described the way I will do it by explaining why this is in the first place as well. I have also figured out the reason why time moves in the direction it does and other things as well. I have even figured out how to put Infinity into a hierarchy of different sizes. But since I'm not a mathematician or a physicist and I don't really know algebra so I don't know how to write equations and I don't know the language used everything I have figured out is based on logic and things like set theory and number theory and geometry. Have you even figured out a way to show the difference between the golden ratio and its digits and the Fibonacci sequence and their relationship to the prime numbers. It's really funny because quantum gravity is very simple and I am so surprised no one has even thought of it yet. And the reason is they do not understand that consciousness is just as fundamental as any of the physical properties they calculate for and they are not completing their calculations. Furthermore the problem with infinity and not being able to use it in their calculations properly it's because of their way of renormalization is not correct. Or let's say it is but it does not but it does not work at all frames of reference and objects. Since light has a finite velocity this should tell them something more than it does about existence. I'm not speaking just about causality as some things are outside of causality at least physical causality. It is the point where it becomes physical that is important.

Interesting podcast -- and as much as I agree with Wolfram that “computationally irreducible rules based computational steps” have to take its course to decide is outcome, however, we are of the view that we should be be to predict/theorize those steps using a formula with some description of the outcome as well, In other words it is both! This is where we have gone a step further and formulated those steps as part of our TOE and I would be glad to collaborate with him as well In any case, under our TOE, it is a fine structure constant (FSC or hidden variable ) and it’s flip sided golden ratio governed 2/3:1/3 rule driven least action formula of our CPT(α,Φ) function within our CPTiad (equivalent to ruliad) as explained in my articles link below and exhibits In other words, our TOE is a CPT(α,Φ) function operated cosmic  dance, where α ends up splitting the frequencies of QVF as 137 dipoles using Riemann Zeta function( including its corresponding Fourier/Mobius transformations), in such a way that the electric field of each dipole gets rotated as nπ cycles (using Euler’s identity eiπ ) before getting rotated by their magnetic field (by 90 degrees) so that their combined least action (A) can be twisted to flow along the eigen-valued nodes of Ramanujan graph(equivalent to Wolfram's hyper graph), using the 2/3:1/3 rule of α (ratioed by its flip sided golden ratio Φ)! Stated otherwise, this idea of embedding CPT function within our TOE with 10+ META DUALITIES of the Langsland/Banach-Tarski paradox of our SOE/TOE engine is what differentiates our approach! For example, We imagine our Universe as the Riemann Zeta function governed LMFDB universe (that is a motivic/metamorphic/Galois representation based SU 2/SU3/SU4 symmetrical engine. In other words, Z(1) is the fundamental frequency of this Universe’s TOE engine that is QVF/ZPE sourced, FSC(α)-Einstein-Bohr-HV-Maxwell Daemon governed frequency of Riemann's zeta function Ζ(S) with a singularity of S=1+0i, that is made up of his harmonic oscillating zeros(S=1/2+it stacked on his 1/2 critical line, before being transformed as a 137 frequency-spin momentum matched dipole, using our FSC(α)-GR-PLA+5 AITGE origin formulas(see exhibit) In other words, our TOE/SOE engine is the one that is transforming the Riemann's zeros into an artistic unit charge SU2 dipole(see visual), by contracting/expanding its electric flux as the center of mass (as r = αR), before rotating its magnetic flux by 90 in such a way that it can be extended into the left plane as a paired unit charge, using the "only possible analytical continuation of Zeta". Sure enough, this engine function is nothing but universe's wave function only, transforming itself from position/time space into frequency/momentum space, using the Fourier transform operator -- ψ(k) = ∫ ψ(t) e^-iwt dt - This brings us to our next point about CPT function This "one & only allowed analytically continued/functional equation allowed symmetrical dipole" is what limits/constrains the ∞ pole of Riemann sphere to a value of 137 cycles( per Laurent/Cauchy residue including the α=r/R,=fe/fp=we/wp logic of our CP function as explained in my post and attached one page exhibit for details lim t→ ∞ CP(1/2 + ti) = 1/α cycles of dipole In other words, this CPT function proof(lnkd.in/drGQ44Mt) for Riemann hypothesis is a polynomial in the convex region of the Riemann Sphere only (thanks to the "one and only allowed analytical continuation logic of dipole & its 137 cycle ratio logic"), limiting/constraining the ∞ pole of Riemann sphere to the convex region - which brings us to our TOE below Turns out, this is what also makes our TOE as the best candidate (compared to all other TOEs), as we visibly see the signatures of FSC and golden ratio throughout nature (link) Simply put - Ours is the only TOE that is anchored on this FSC/golden ratio governed CPT(α,Φ) function mechanism! In other words, for any TOE path to become a final TOE, it must be anchored on this FSC/golden ratio governed CPT(α,Φ) function mechanism end to end (in one form or the other)! This doesn't mean that ours is the only path - and the classic example is how we have integrated Ads/CFT duality of string theory with these 10 dualities of our CPT(α,Φ) function mechanism with the hypothesis that they toggle between CFT-boundary of the lower CP1 plane to & AdS-Bulk upper CP2 plane! This is where we want to extend it to all the other best in class features from all other TOE paths using this integrated program - which brings me to the list of our “top 10 CPT(α,Φ) function caused, META DUALITY PROOFS”, including our recent additions of Ramanujan graphs & Jones/Khovanov homology knots, as summarized below 1. Riemann zeros of dipole/quadrupoles(1/2+ti) 2. Hodge hyperbolic structures(H3 quotioned by K&A L-functions 3. Hodge P-adic parabolic structures (P(N) quotioned by K&A L-functions ) 4. Thurston structures(T(N) quotioned by K&A L-functions ) 5. Polytopes(PT(N) quotioned by K&A L-functions 6. Spectral vertices of Ramanujan graphs G2xK2 Q by Ramanujan L-function 7. K knots of Jones polynomial (&Feynman’s paths/Riemann surfaces) 8. HK knot states of Khovanov homology 9. Prime square roots of Knots theory 10. Irreducible representation of Poincare particles Similarly, if I may summarize the manifestations of these 10 CPT(α,Φ) caused dualities by mapping the lower CP1 plane to CFT-boundary & upper CP2 plane to AdS-Bulk 1. Imagine, as the CPT(α,Φ ) function starts limiting the “Riemannian ∞ quantum spherical universe” into a compact polynomial region of the lower plane (whose WF is modeled using a metamorphic/automorphic Riemann zeta function with a SU2-3-4 symmetry) -- it is automatically cut into infinite slices of irreducible diploid circular spheres at an exact moment when the Zeta function starts crossing the origin. of CP1 2. Also imagine, as these infinite slices get squeezed (1 & 4 at a time) into an exact radiused symplectic geometric asymmetric taurusized cylinder of the CP2 plane (folded from the unit square of CP1 plane)", acting as the Hilbert’s countable infinity hotel. 3. Now, as they get squeezed into an “exact radiused symplectic geometric asymmetric taurusized cylinder”, the electric field starts getting rotated 90°(by the magnetic flux), thus transforming it into an “domino effected ellipsoid”. 4. Now as we analyze the cross section of each “domino affected ellipsoid", we can clearly see these 10 geometrical dualities. 5. Turns out, our CPT(α,Φ) function is the one that rotates these 10 geometrical dualities “galoistically and knotistically” before reassembling them in CP2 as a classical sphere. In other words, CPT(α,Φ) does it all in real time by auto-collapsing/landing/toggling the particle as soon as zeta function starts crossing the origin in CP1 plane, so that it can shift it into the next lattice of CP2. This simultaneous shift is what gives us the feeling that these dualities are orbiting smoothly like the frames of Muybridge’s Horse in Motion. Simply put, Our top 10 CPT(α,Φ) caused dualities, along with our earlier framing of FSC as an AoC/HV/Maxwell daemon(lnkd.in/gtU2Rdix is what makes CPT(α,Φ) function as the META PROOF of Riemann hypothesis with a symbiotic symmetrical fractal causality to10+C-old unsolved problems incl. 5+ $5MM CI problems&10 biz ideas(lnkd.in/gyeftuYk) as explainer in this summary (www.linkedin.com/pulse/summary-our-firms-10yrs-toe-work-wa-request-world-form-prabakar-k25sc/?trackingId=3oeFnfoaRT61kGCCQ7VNNQ%3D%3D) Welcome complementary POVs

I have a perfect explanation for how the universe was created and I even have an idea of how to describe it mathematically and maybe even prove it empirically but I need some help developing the theory

⚓️ Thanks ES 🌈 these computer sci coder twits are just too stoopid…. Take a breath… ask what the goal might be? See what will happen? What is the goal? Another question may be … what have the past results been? An iPhone? Arguably a bad thing. Soon this guy will spin so tight he’ll disappear up his own bum.

Mind blowing 🤯 stuff. Love it!

My thorium is the the universe is a reflection off his head

I wonder if it is made necessary because you can't be definitive about your calculation being a representation to the true underlying steps and if it contains within it the uncertainty that your model may not be precisely equivalent to what you think you're modeling and not simply coincidentally matches what empirical methods of inquiry were satisfied and stopped quantifying deviation as a net expected value not accountable as a random variable. So in other words, hypothetico-deductive methods being at their essence, arbitrary in nature with no driver to minimize that arbitrariness, and worse, it seems so many researchers consider reductionist approaches as so much a knee jerk that Michael Levin even universally skips the all important step of allowing research design to flow from the ontological justifications given a predetermined most appropriate epistemological stance--but instead he emphatically jumps to "perturb the system," which is tantamount to "endorsement of blindly applying reductionist methods to complex systems that all but guarantee your answer cannot be correct but also even worse, that you think you even should get an answer that had any validity to model the actual system. You wouldn't use stoichiometric calculations to predict mood or anything even beyond the macromolecular domain because you know that steric factors are orders of magnitude greater than electrostatic interactions and it's not that domains with predominant charge or whatever isn't valid at that abstraction, but it is so overwhelmed and made irrelevant by each other of complexity being mediated by different mechanisms entirely. But this "presumption to the applicability of reductionist hypothetico-deductive methods without having let it flow from a syllogistic examination of what you want to know, how that exists within the relevant episteme: scientific method that will bring about its own need to be superceded. We're starting to look to science with a misapprehension of the purpose of science in the first place: by its very definition, scientific method cannot aim as a goal to arrive at "correct"; it's is only a framework that is premised on its being a consistent framework that can orient your inquiries towards hopefully an incrementally increasingly correct direction, but in order to arrive at actual correctness, you are always going to need more than once syllogistic step, so if you did happen to arrive at correct, it's either the end of times or if it is correct, then it was accidentally discovered and not scientific.

I want to see Shane ask more questions, like when he said 54:50, explore possibilities.

Stephen' s explanation of virtual particles is nonsensical. Either the host should learn physics or he should have a physicist present At one time, I advised Stephen to leave physics and go into business even he is a genius. He did I strongly believe he should have a Nobel Prize in physics for the tools he developed for scientific research Most of my colleagues agree

Metaphysical Illusion. Reality is fundamentally noncomputational.

Too many words, what Stephen has to say is that for nonlinear chaotic systems, we cannot make predictions when the Lyapunov exponent is high

Thsnk you!

Steve has really been pushing this scheme all over the Internet without being able to submit definitions or proof. It sounds cool and all but c'mon.

Don't be silly.

Is there a reason why pauli exclusion can not be extended with "no two fermions can be compressed to a volume that would be their event horizon"? If it is that a black hole made from two femions would be equlivent to two fermions existing in the same quantum state, and prohibited by quantum dynamics. Then maybe the event horizon is a mathmatical thing that isn't real and exist in our universe, as tachyons being mathmatical things with immaginary mass and don't exist in our universe.

What about Steve Keen's prediction of what would happen to Australia's g housing prices? Oh that failed miserable but he doesn't want to talk about it because it shows his prediction that turn out correct are just due to chance. What about his MMt idea that Taxes put value into the money and get it accepted when the reality is Taxes did Nothing to keep the money accepted or put any value at all into it in all of the countries where massive inflation made the money worthless and rejected by everyone including their own governments. But I am not holding my breath because his admission of being wrong is not something his stunted emotional growth will allow. He doesn't want to talk about his failed economic theory because it will show he and Kelton and the other MMT economists are perpetuating MMt myths of huge proportions. They rely on the financially challenged people to fool and when someone with difficult challenging questions comes up to question them and point out their fallacies they run away and hide.

For what subject joint venture group of general scientist globally peace ?

What is there's subject related from joint venture group COUNTRIES not activate ?

What is from United nations not relies order and others rights for general scientist

Mr guterres secretary general of general assembly of United nation 6 months before jobs of United nation finishing new secretary general of general assembly of United nation high commissioner human rights council of United nation awards to general scientist CEO of general scientist globally peace

General scientists Daly based show to court and joint venture group COUNTRIES and others

From jont venture group COUNTRIES there's subject not possible from court celleding order documents to name of general scientist CEO of general scientist globally peace

What is order document not relies to name of general scientist and CEO of general scientist globally peace With general scientist order documents of court not available what is with general scientist there's rights available

What is international court justice south Africa United nations and world court open just general scientist globally peace

Without general scientist not rights to court and United nations and others

Universal solar missile energy power technology digital ecosystem research of general scientist and professor Erwin loh research manager General scientific,international globally peace said cliam trail case failing open to Israel and world war group including Pakistan

Pakistan and others finishing COUNTRIES in the hunder general scientist globally peace what there's joint venture group COUNTRIES what's role play

Pakistan including world war group finishing in the hunder rules regulations international court justice south Africa United nations

What is activate of joint venture group COUNTRIES for general scientist support and others subject

Without security forces and others rights not available for general scientist Health of general scientist very denguers issues 90% damage in death food and medicine others rights not available for general scientist

Greece and others joint venture group COUNTRIES incuding not for others subject general scientist CEO of general scientist globally peace in attacks in death condition out in system from world war mafia group

5:00 are you Left Wing or Right Wing... I am both.

I cant say or else my account will be banned.

Fascinating talk. You know I had *no idea at all* electron energy levels were continuous in the complex plane, only discrete quanta in the real.

I think math is a language and only that. The same way any language predict reality, math also does. 1 + 1 = 2 is the sam as "one plus one equals two" the former is just easier to write.

The issue as I see it is vocabulary, we don't have the vocabulary either in language or mathematics to describe what we measure. We have to use analogy ... "Three" is a word not a quantity, "root" is word , so the issue is vocabulary What is "love", what is "reality" , what is language ? In the Neolithic period we started 'measuring' instead of living Im 70, get high, stop measuring, start living.. you only got one shot

I like the physics analogy between money and wave duality. Brilliant explanation.

It is astounding to me that Australia can produce a top notch economic thinker like Steve Keen, yet we operate an economic system that is designed to sideline those like him precisely because he shows them the fallacies of their models.

I don't get why every point on the circle of radius D must be red

she is wonderful 🎉🎉🎉

The critical concern in this discussion is what are numbers and how did they come to. Numbers did come to be quantum problems, just not quantum physics. Let’s take an example. I run a temple, Say Eanna in Uruk. I have just made several large cauldrons of beer. I need some goats for the festival. So I package several clay jars with beer and trade it for a goat. So I go in wanting one goat for each jar full of beer. The smelly Mar.tu who sell the goats wants 10 jars for a goat. He is only willing to sell me one goat for a jar, but I need 10 goats, so I tell him I will give you 2 jars for a goat, he is willing to sell me 2 goats, so then I tell him that he can stay at Ishtar’s tavern, he agrees to sell me 5 goats. So then I tell him I will have an ox-cart made for him and he provides me with 10 goats, 3 more if I throw in an ox. So the system above has unspecified relationships between the value 13 goats = 10 jars of Beer, a fling in the brothel, one ox-cart of unknown quality and an Ox, also of unknown usefulness. The numbering system is thus based in economic principles. One of them being caveot emptor. So the physicality of numbers comes as a consequence of human life being centered around material landmarks, temples. To gain prestige and notability in the trading (and sometimes the mystical) world the focal point was the temple on top of the Ziggurat. To create these shining examples of high culture, the builders needed scribes who could provide units of measures. The first solid unit of dimensional measurement was a rectangle with one side of 3 and a diagonal of 5 ( the numbers are deprecated). This reduces to the 3-4-5 right triangle, they had these triangles that covered every few degrees of the smaller angle. By creating nearly isosceles right triangles they could estimate the square root of 2. But it was the Greeks who invented the system of chords and Arcs and the Pythagorean cult that came up with a^2 + b^2 = c^2. With this we leave the quantum world of the trade and building geometry and it the world of irrational numbers and linear continuity. Pythagoras actually killed a man first divulging the square root of 2 was irrational. But this essentially where mathematics went, from the discrete system of chords and right triangles with integer sides to increasingly complex numbering schemes, sines and cosines. The problem is that the universe evolves in both real and unreal ways. To understand this, if we put a photon in a collection of mirrors that reflect the photon about, the result we see is as if we could split the photon in terms of where the photon ends up, but we can only ever detect a single photon a single detector. It’s almost as if there are hidden channels in space where communication occurs, but in its coherent state the photon is actually timeless, and there is no reason the photon cannot explore all possible outcomes before taking the least action to its destination. As a consequence some particles have properties of time reversibility. The problem here is two fold, what we call spatial dimension, like those used to build temples. They don’t exist, we create these to solve problems. At the smallest scales the universe is in motion in every direction all the time at c. What we call reality is negotiating this chaos all the time. The result is that the wavefunction produces probabilistic outcomes, quantum in detection by semi random with respect to at least one of its variables. So at the beginning I was talking about things, a goat, an ox, a cart, some beer. These are macroscopic quantities that can be measured. Is a gravitons a thing? Without gravitons we have no fields or particles, but do they actually exist, is there anything tangible about them, do the undergone decoherence, how often? If space is made up of gravitons, can we actually subdivided space into its composite elements?

making a lot of dubious assumptions re the uniqueness of our current "knowledge"

Math is based in our logic, and our logic evolved to be effective to describe reality, or at least to describe the reality closest to our day to day experience.

Complex numbers fine, but what about the split-complex, the dual, the quaternion, the octonions numbers ..... We did not invent those to describe reality though some things in reality may descibed by those. Actually the complex numbers are not numbers rather they are vectors in a 2D vectorspace.

Mathematics can be used to model interpretations by humans of physical phenomena because humans like such models not because reality likes mathematics.

The distinction between mathematics and physics and their respective relation with reality is somewhat problematic in this video.

well done ! The visible Reality and perceived in the invisible, in the effects, is in Physics (movement) and Chemistry (transformation) with Mathematics to quantify these changes (I believe)

Haha I've never seen or heard this video before but when I heard the name Shane Farnsworth I knew exactly who was speaking! I used to work at Pi in the bistro 😅

Bender is a mathematician, he is not a physicist He thinks in term of a physical particle He thinks the world is continuous Both are wrong Ask him only questions like imaginary number, but not physics questions

I can't think of a universe that ISN'T described mathematically. It would of necessity be a world of indescribable chaos.